linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/14] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set,notify}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1228490712.15920.45.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Date:	Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:25:12 -0500
From:	"David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, "Matthew N. Dodd" <matthew.dodd@...rta.com>,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no, bfields@...ldses.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	labeled-nfs@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set,notify}secctx hooks
	to access LSM security context information.

On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:58 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, David P. Quigley wrote:
> 
> > + * @inode_getsecctx:
> > + * 	Returns a string containing all relavent security context information
> > + *
> > + * 	@inode we wish to set the security context of.
> > + *	@ctx is a pointer in which to place the allocated security context.
> > + *	@ctxlen points to the place to put the length of @ctx.
> >   * This is the main security structure.
> >   */
> >  struct security_operations {
> > @@ -1479,6 +1514,10 @@ struct security_operations {
> >  	int (*secctx_to_secid) (const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
> >  	void (*release_secctx) (char *secdata, u32 seclen);
> >  
> > +	int (*inode_notifysecctx)(struct inode *inode, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen);
> > +	int (*inode_setsecctx)(struct dentry *dentry, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen);
> > +	int (*inode_getsecctx)(struct inode *inode, void **ctx, u32 *ctxlen);
> 
> For inode_getsecctx(), you're returning the length via the return value, 
> so you should not also need to pass in a pointer to ctxlen, right?
> 
> IMHO, it's clearer and simpler to always only return error status from 
> these kinds of functions, and to pass things like size back via pointer 
> args, although it seems that a few mixed return functions have crept in to 
> the code over time.  My preference would be to convert it to return value 
> is error status only, with the length entirely separate as a pointer arg.
> 
> 
> - James

I'll have to look into why we did it this way. The discussion for these
patches happened many months ago so I don't remember why it was done
this way. I remember at the time getting an approval for the approach
but a desire not to merge the patch while there were no users of it.

Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/