[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1228502189.3858.57.camel@blaa>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:36:29 +0000
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: make PCI devices take a virtio_pci module ref
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:43 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:17 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> > +static void virtio_pci_release_dev(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > /* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so
> > * we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I think it
> > * would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own device. */
> > static struct device virtio_pci_root = {
> > .parent = NULL,
> > .bus_id = "virtio-pci",
> > + .release = virtio_pci_release_dev,
> > };
> >
>
> Actually, we should be able to delete this virtio_pci_root entirely.
> The device is a dummy one anyway.
Care to recall why it was added initially and what's changed?
One side effect of removing it is that each device appears on its own
in /sys/devices rather than neatly under /sys/devices/virtio-pci.
(And one side effect of that is that the aforementioned Fedora mkinitrd
kludge stops working which would make me sad :-)
Cheers,
mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists