lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081205.120814.51226316.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:08:14 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	eranian@...glemail.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
	robert.richter@....com, arjan@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux

From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:39:43 +0100

> Given these are more obscure features, but not being able to fit
> them easily into your model from the start isn't a very promising sign
> for the long term extensibility of the design.

Another thing I'm interested in is if this new stuff will work with
performance counters that lack an overflow interrupt.

We have several chips that are like this, and perfmon supported that
on the kernel side, and also provided overflow emulation for such
hardware in userspace (where such complexity belongs).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ