[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812060930490.3425@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:33:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Rework default handling of suspend and resume
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> USB doesn't use that for PCI suspend-resume, it uses it for suspend-resume of
> USB devices behind the controller.
Oh, in that case there are no PCI users of this at all, and what the PCI
driver does is immaterial ;)
> But then we will save the device's registers in the "sleeping" state.
No no. The rule would be that a PCI driver - if it uses the new
infrastructure, which apparently nobody does _as_ a PCI driver - simply
would never do the whole "pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot)" etc crud AT ALL.
So a PCI driver would only do higher-level stuff in its suspend/resume
code. For example, a USB host controller would initiate the USB bus level
stuff, and likely just stop the controller (not suspend it - just stop
it).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists