[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081206054459.GB7582@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:14:59 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: penberg@...helsinki.fi, jdike@...toit.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][UML] Boot broken due to buffer overrun
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> [2008-12-02 12:17:07]:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:50:39 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > * Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> [2008-11-29 12:21:46]:
> >
> > > Hi Balbir,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Balbir Singh
> > > <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > mconsole_init() passed 256 bytes as length in os_create_unix_socket, while
> > > > the sizeof UNIX_PATH_MAX is 108. This patch fixes that problem and avoids
> > > > a big overrun bug reported on UML bootup.
> > >
> > > Maybe mention that ->sun_path in struct sockaddr_un is UNIX_PATH_MAX
> > > long which causes the problem?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, the changelog can definitely add that to the changelog, I'll
> > resend the patch if Jeff asks for it.
>
> Jeff's been quiet lately - I'll merge this one.
>
Thanks!
> I also tagged it for -stable, subject to Jeff's OK. I'm wondering why
> this wasn't observed in earlier kernels?
>
I observed it with the newer toolchain that uses __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL
and __FORTIFY_SOURCE
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists