linux-kernel - Re: Is vm86old no more implemented?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:52:43 +0300
From:	Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is vm86old no more implemented?

On Суббота 06 декабря 2008 11:56:03 Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru> writes:
> > CONFIG_VM86 is defined; is there anything else that is needed? This fails
> > both in 2.6.27.7 and in 2.6.28-rc7. I attach config from 2.6.28-rc7.
>
> It should still work. Can you double check you're running the correct
> kernel? Perhaps a 64bit kernel (which doesn't implement it).
>

Linux cooker 2.6.28-rc7-1avb #23 Fri Dec 5 22:42:47 MSK 2008 i686 Pentium III 
(Coppermine) GNU/Linux

Anything else I can check?

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)