linux-kernel - Re: Runaway loop with the current git.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081207181559.63549cfc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:15:59 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	"Evgeniy Polyakov" <zbr@...emap.net>,
	"Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Runaway loop with the current git.

> Yes, log nowhere instead of running in a loop would be much better
> than loading a 5:1 driver which will never exist as a module.

The loop is detected and terminated.
> 
> > Why is this useful - you now get failing module loads producing no
> > diagnostics and in many case the setup just dying silently.
> 
> It's obviously more useful than not to boot up.

What makes you think it will now boot up. The loop is already detected
and terminated. What will you do if it doesn't and you get no
diagnostics. How will distributions debug those reports in bugzilla.

> No, the pci driver will never get loaded by modprobe 5:1,

Why not ? You have no idea how the other millions of Linux users have
their module loading rules configured. A change which breaks this
behaviour is a regression.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/