[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812062201230.3425@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:03:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Rework default handling of suspend
and resume
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> And btw, I'm talking suspend, not hibernate.
And, btw, even if anybody actually does this, it should be up to the
interrupt controller logic to re-initialize the interrupts so that they
are back where they belong. IOW, we should never show such _idiotic_
brokenness to any actual driver, it should all be remapped and handled
below them.
And I still have never heard any valid reason to do it in the first place,
so until somebody actually gives a real example and an explanation, I
would suggest ignoring the whole issue as some insane rumblings from crazy
hw/firmare people doing idiotic things.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists