linux-kernel - Re: [HW PROBLEM] Intel I7 MCE. Erratum or not?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <493D0D42.2090203@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:04:18 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Giangiacomo Mariotti <gg.mariotti@...il.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [HW PROBLEM] Intel I7 MCE. Erratum or not?


> I'm not sure but is it make sense if SMI causes an error and dropped MCE
> exception without clearing error record?

I wouldn't expect an SMI causing an internal cache machine check. That really
looks more like something that comes out of the initialization code. But
I haven't see it on any Nehalem system so far.

Also it might be really some problem with this particular CPU.

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/