linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: signal interrupts entry/exit points on outpout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c62985530812080538p3802f329vf6e12695d734f16d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:38:31 +0100
From:	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: signal interrupts entry/exit points on outpout

2008/12/8 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>:
> On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 01:54 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Impact: provide interrupt detection on output
>>
>> Suggested by Ingo.
>> If a hardirq is raised, we want it to be signaled on output, so this patch
>> adds two arrows on the output to find entry and exit points of a hardirq.
>>
>> Unfortunately, there are many interrupt entrypoints and these can be differents
>> from one arch to another.
>>
>> The approach here is one of the easiest, but doesn't shine by its scalability:
>> we have an array of the interrupt entrypoints names that we compare with the
>> symbol of the current traced function, if it matches, we draw the arrow.
>>
>> Ie:
>>
>>  1)               |                                unlock_buffer() {
>>  1)               |                                  wake_up_bit() {
>>  1)               |                                    bit_waitqueue() {
>>  1)   0.872 us    |                                      __phys_addr();
>>  1)   2.722 us    |                                    }
>>  1)               |                                    __wake_up_bit() {
>>  1)              ==>                                   __wake_up_bit() {
>>  1)               |                                      do_IRQ() {
>
> Would be much nicer, the current proposal is lost when grepping and adds
> a weird visual break in the output.


Ok, I will apply it like this in the V2.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/