[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k5aan2yy.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:41:57 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v2
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
> This means that the only correct technical/mathematical argument is to
> talk about "levels of noise" and how they compare and correlate - and
> i've seen no actual measurements or estimations pro or contra. Group
> readout of counters can reduce noise for sure, but it is wrong for you to
> try to turn this into some sort of all-or-nothing property. Other sources
> of noise tend to be of much higher of magnitude.
Ingo, could you please describe how PEBS and IBS fit into your model?
Thanks.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists