linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] idle_balance() does not call load_balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1228750051.6939.1.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:27:31 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] idle_balance() does not call load_balance_newidle()

On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:52 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> load_balance_newidle() does not get called if SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE is
> set at higher level domain (3-CPU) and not in low level domain (2-MC).
> 
> pulled_task is initialised to -1 and checked for non-zero which is
> always true if the lowest level sched_domain does not have
> SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE flag set.
> 
> Trivial fix to initialise pulled_task to zero.
> Patch against 2.6.28-rc7
> 
> Thanks,
> Vaidy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Seems sane

> ---
> 
>  kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index f79c7c4..4abdce1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -3801,7 +3801,7 @@ out_balanced:
>  static void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
>  {
>  	struct sched_domain *sd;
> -	int pulled_task = -1;
> +	int pulled_task = 0;
>  	unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + HZ;
>  	cpumask_t tmpmask;
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/