[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493D4C63.5040502@yandex.ru>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:33:39 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: dedekind@...radead.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: UBI/DVB ioctl conflict?
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2008, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:41 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this only matters for devices that would
>>> implement both the UBI and DVB API on the same inode ? That would be quite
>>> unlikely.
>> Yeah, I guess. But this anyway makes sense to keep ioctls
>> non-overlapping.
>
> We try hard (but sometimes fail) to keep every ioctl number unique.
> The reason for this is that the device drivers are not the only
> pieces of code that look at them. Specifically, three other things
> frequently cause problems here:
Thanks for the reply. Do you know the status of the
Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt file - it does not seem to be up-to-date.
Should I document add UBI ioctls there?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists