[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1228756056.7862.8.camel@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:07:36 +0100
From: Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RT] avoid preemption in memory controller code
> > the lru_lock of struct mem_group_per_zone is used to avoid preemption
> > during the __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe function.
> > therefore, a raw_spinlock_t should be used.
>
> What is the reason that this must avoid preemption?
it guards a call to smp_processor_id() in __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe().
see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.rt.user/3690
> Is there another
> way to solve this? I rather not just add a raw spinlock if we can
> help it.
not sure, maybe one can disable preemption for that specific function?
tim
--
tim@...ngt.org
http://tim.klingt.org
Art is either a complaint or do something else
John Cage quoting Jasper Johns
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists