[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020812081128p6d1e2a55v69996a360e7f0e8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:28:04 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Dennis Hardy" <dhardy@...etthis.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, layton@...hat.com,
"Steven French" <sfrench@...ibm.com>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8
Hi Dennis,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy <dhardy@...etthis.com> wrote:
> I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under 2.6.27.8, and
> the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect:
>
> root@...dus:~# df -h /mnt/fsv1
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> //fsv1/Users 446G -222G 667G - /mnt/fsv1
> root@...dus:~# df /mnt/fsv1
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> //fsv1/Users 467403140 -231816588 699219728 - /mnt/fsv1
> root@...dus:~# mount | grep fsv1
> //fsv1/Users on /mnt/fsv1 type cifs (rw,mand)
> root@...dus:~#
>
> Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8? This worked fine
> in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)...
>
> Ideas?
Well, lets cc the relevant people so your report isn't lost in the noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists