linux-kernel - Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <493D8A8B.9090201@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:58:51 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Dennis Hardy <dhardy@...etthis.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, layton@...hat.com,
	Steven French <sfrench@...ibm.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Holger Hoffstaette <holger@...ards.de>
Subject: Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy <dhardy@...etthis.com> wrote:
>>> I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under 2.6.27.8, and
>>> the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect:
...
>>> Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8?  This worked fine
>>> in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)...

There were several cifs updates in .8 but AFAIU none in .7.

> FWIW, it seems to be related to this one: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/8/7

Holger's report is about the userland SMB/CIFS server, while Denis's is
about kernelspace client code.  They look like separate issues to me.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ==-- -=---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/