[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081209.032955.101042639.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:29:55 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: eranian@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dada1@...mosbay.com,
robert.richter@....com, arjan@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, rostedt@...dmis.org, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v2
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:22:25 +0100
>
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:02:46 +0100
> >
> > >
> > > * stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > There's also more generic x86 support: all 4 generic PMCs of Nehalem
> > > > > / Core i7 are supported - i've run 4 instances of KernelTop and they
> > > > > used up four separate PMCs.
> > > >
> > > > Core/Atom have 5 counters, Nehalem has 7. Why are you not using all of
> > > > them already?
> > >
> > > no, Nehalem has 4 generic purpose PMCs and 3 fixed-purpose PMCs (7
> > > total),
> > ...
> > > Saying that it has 7 is misleading.
> >
> > Even you just did.
>
> which portion of my point stressing the general purpose attribute was
> unclear to you?
I'm just teasing you because you picked a trite point from stephane's
email instead of the meat later on, which I would have found more
interesting to hear you comment on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists