linux-kernel - [PATCH] /proc/acpi/alarm: handle day-of-month wraparound on readback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <493E92D6.8090104@rtr.ca>
Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:46:30 -0500
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] /proc/acpi/alarm: handle day-of-month wraparound on readback

(repost)

Fix month wrap issue with readback from /proc/acpi/alarm
This bug has been around *forever*.

  $ echo '2008-12-01 10:36:20' > /proc/acpi/alarm
  $ cat /proc/acpi/alarm
  2008-11-01 10:36:20

Note how the readback above shows the month incorrectly
when the alarm is set in the *next* calendar month.
But with this patch applied, it shows the correct month (12).

This patch applies/works on 2.6.28-rc6.
Probably best to queue it up for the next major cycle.

Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>

--- old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c	2008-11-20 18:19:22.000000000 -0500
+++ rc6/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c	2008-12-01 17:07:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -84,12 +84,15 @@
 #define	HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM
 #endif
 
+static u32 cmos_bcd_read(int offset, int rtc_control);
+
 #ifdef	HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM
 
 static int acpi_system_alarm_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 {
 	u32 sec, min, hr;
 	u32 day, mo, yr, cent = 0;
+	u32 today = 0;
 	unsigned char rtc_control = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -97,38 +100,32 @@
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
 
-	sec = CMOS_READ(RTC_SECONDS_ALARM);
-	min = CMOS_READ(RTC_MINUTES_ALARM);
-	hr = CMOS_READ(RTC_HOURS_ALARM);
 	rtc_control = CMOS_READ(RTC_CONTROL);
+	sec = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_SECONDS_ALARM, rtc_control);
+	min = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_MINUTES_ALARM, rtc_control);
+	hr = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_HOURS_ALARM, rtc_control);
 
 	/* If we ever get an FACP with proper values... */
-	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm)
+	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm) {
 		/* ACPI spec: only low 6 its should be cared */
 		day = CMOS_READ(acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm) & 0x3F;
-	else
-		day = CMOS_READ(RTC_DAY_OF_MONTH);
+		if (!(rtc_control & RTC_DM_BINARY) || RTC_ALWAYS_BCD)
+			day = bcd2bin(day);
+	} else
+		day = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_DAY_OF_MONTH, rtc_control);
 	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm)
-		mo = CMOS_READ(acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm);
-	else
-		mo = CMOS_READ(RTC_MONTH);
+		mo = cmos_bcd_read(acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm, rtc_control);
+	else {
+		mo = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_MONTH, rtc_control);
+		today = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_DAY_OF_MONTH, rtc_control);
+	}
 	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.century)
-		cent = CMOS_READ(acpi_gbl_FADT.century);
+		cent = cmos_bcd_read(acpi_gbl_FADT.century, rtc_control);
 
-	yr = CMOS_READ(RTC_YEAR);
+	yr = cmos_bcd_read(RTC_YEAR, rtc_control);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
 
-	if (!(rtc_control & RTC_DM_BINARY) || RTC_ALWAYS_BCD) {
-		sec = bcd2bin(sec);
-		min = bcd2bin(min);
-		hr = bcd2bin(hr);
-		day = bcd2bin(day);
-		mo = bcd2bin(mo);
-		yr = bcd2bin(yr);
-		cent = bcd2bin(cent);
-	}
-
 	/* we're trusting the FADT (see above) */
 	if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.century)
 		/* If we're not trusting the FADT, we should at least make it
@@ -153,6 +150,20 @@
 	else
 		yr += cent * 100;
 
+	/*
+	 * Show correct dates for alarms up to a month into the future.
+	 * This solves issues for nearly all situations with the common
+	 * 30-day alarm clocks in PC hardware.
+	 */
+	if (day < today) {
+		if (mo < 12) {
+			mo += 1;
+		} else {
+			mo = 1;
+			yr += 1;
+		}
+	}
+
 	seq_printf(seq, "%4.4u-", yr);
 	(mo > 12) ? seq_puts(seq, "**-") : seq_printf(seq, "%2.2u-", mo);
 	(day > 31) ? seq_puts(seq, "** ") : seq_printf(seq, "%2.2u ", day);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/