[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493E9F3E.3020902@nortel.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:39:26 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: eranian@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> When there are two (or more) hw metrics to profile, the ideally best
> (i.e. the statistically most stable and most relevant) sampling for the
> two statistical variables (say of l2_misses versus l2_accesses) is to
> sample them independently, via their own metric. Not via a static 1khz
> rate - or via picking one of the variables to generate samples.
Regardless of sampling method, don't you still want some way to
enable/disable the various counters as close to simultaneously as possible?
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists