linux-kernel - Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:39:26 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	eranian@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v2

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> When there are two (or more) hw metrics to profile, the ideally best 
> (i.e. the statistically most stable and most relevant) sampling for the 
> two statistical variables (say of l2_misses versus l2_accesses) is to 
> sample them independently, via their own metric. Not via a static 1khz 
> rate - or via picking one of the variables to generate samples.

Regardless of sampling method, don't you still want some way to 
enable/disable the various counters as close to simultaneously as possible?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/