[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081209170543.59b4fb73@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:05:43 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...split.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] waitfd: file descriptor to wait on child processes
> prototype for a fourth: waitfd. It pretty much does what the name
> suggests: reading from it yields a series of status ints (as would be
> written into the second argument of waitpid) for child processes that
> have changed state. It takes essentially the same arguments as waitpid
> (for now) and supports the same set of features.
This propogates the fundamental braindamage of waitpid - the fact the
notification only works on child process trees.
Here is a more elegant suggestion - use epoll, inotify and friends fully
on /proc process nodes.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists