[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812091248020.19115@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:52:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The -rt git tree
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker wrote:
>
> Hi Steve.
>
> That's a good news.
>
> But after converting these spinlocks into lock_t, how will you synchronize with
> the mainline on each release? You will have a huge amount of conflicts
> at every merges...
This is why master is separate from rt-master. The rt-master will grow
like tip/master does. But the master will be recreated each time.
Basically, the creation of master is this:
git checkout master
git reset --hard rt-master
./scripts/convert-spinlocks
git commit -a -m 'Convert all spinlocks to lock_t'
./scripts/convert-locks
git commit -a -m 'Convert some locks back to spinlock_t'
Thus we do not need to worry about the conflicts caused by the lock
conversion. That will be done automatically each time we create a new
master.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists