[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081209190403.2731dfd0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:04:03 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...split.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] waitfd: file descriptor to wait on child processes
> > This propogates the fundamental braindamage of waitpid - the fact the
> > notification only works on child process trees.
> >
> > Here is a more elegant suggestion - use epoll, inotify and friends fully
> > on /proc process nodes.
> Last I checked inotify was not supported in /proc, or at least most of
> it. What kind of work load is it to change that?
I don't know but I think it would be the better approach to find it. That
also separates notification of state to parents from the general problem
of wanting to know when a service has died, which seems to be an ever
more common point of interest on the desktop in particular.
File content change notification for /proc is hard because the contents
don't exist in the normal way and get updated but can be done if there is
a wait queue for the job. Actual changes to structure (new directories
etc) is in part a similar problem but there are clear points already in
existence when the proc nodes are created/destroyed and thus notification
can occur.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists