linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] module_refcounting and anonymous inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200812091743.26586.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:43:25 +0800
From:	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
To:	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] module_refcounting and anonymous inodes

On Monday 08 December 2008 19:57:14 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> >> Hello Avi,
> >>
> >> here is the latest respin of my fixes for the kvm module unload problem:
> >>
> >> [PATCH 1/2] anon_inodes: use fops->owner for module refcount
> >> [PATCH 2/2] kvm: set owner of cpu and vm file operations
> >
> > In the meantime patch 2 has a offset against the latest git. Should I
> > resend the patch or will you apply it anyway?
>
> Applied the patches; thanks for the reminder.

Should we push the first patch to 2.6.28? I got some trouble with the separate 
2nd patch, for I am using Linus' tree and make KVM as modules, so the 
reference count reduced to negative now... (Oh Avi, I know you suggest to use 
in kernel rather than modules, but module is indeed convenient. :) )

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/