linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] user namespaces: document CFS behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081209100817.GA11886@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:08:17 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] user namespaces: document CFS behavior


* James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > hm, i'd rather carry these in the scheduler tree as we've got some 
> > changes in this area already and because these are arguably scheduler 
> > changes:
> > 
> >  Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  kernel/user.c                                |    8 +++++++-
> > 
> > the incompleteness of CONFIG_USER_SCHED is not addressed yet.
> > 
> > Ok?
> 
> They're already published in my tree.  Do you want me to revert them?

I've also got it published :-/ If it's at the tail of your commits, can 
you reset it?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/