[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081209110246.GC21618@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:02:46 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: eranian@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v2
* stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > There's also more generic x86 support: all 4 generic PMCs of Nehalem
> > / Core i7 are supported - i've run 4 instances of KernelTop and they
> > used up four separate PMCs.
>
> Core/Atom have 5 counters, Nehalem has 7. Why are you not using all of
> them already?
no, Nehalem has 4 generic purpose PMCs and 3 fixed-purpose PMCs (7
total), Core/Atom has 2 generic PMCs and 3 fixed-purpose PMCs (5 total).
Saying that it has 7 is misleading. (and even the generic PMCs have
constraints)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists