[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812100643130.5912@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:46:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@...bigcorporation.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RT] Compile-time fix.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
>
> Compile-time fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@...e.de>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
> index 585feed..b74fdc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
> #include <linux/linkage.h>
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>
> /*
Sven,
Thanks for looking into this, but do not get too eager to send updates
yet. I'm massively rewriting the rt/rt-locks branch, and the flux rate is
very high. A patch like this will become obsolete in seconds.
If you do want to help, look at any of the other branches. Some have not
been updated yet, and they all should be able to compile and boot on their
own. If they do not, then those need to be fixed.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists