| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1228918928.21454.27.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:22:08 +0000 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com, weidong.han@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > So now its open how this will be merged alltogether. We can merge it in > three steps (first from Dave's tree, then Avi and at last my IOMMU > updates which has to happen in that order). > The other option is to merge this all with one pull-request I send to > Linus. It should not conflict with your updates Avi because all these > changes apply also cleanly to current linus/master. > Is this acceptable for everyone? > > David, its important to hear your opinion on that because this single > pull-request would include all VT-d updates you have queued in your > tree? Is this ok for you? Yes, that's fine by me. Should I apply patches 1-14 of Weidong's patch set from Monday first? Or just let you do that? -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists