linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:22:08 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	weidong.han@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU

On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> So now its open how this will be merged alltogether. We can merge it in
> three steps (first from Dave's tree, then Avi and at last my IOMMU
> updates which has to happen in that order).
> The other option is to merge this all with one pull-request I send to
> Linus. It should not conflict with your updates Avi because all these
> changes apply also cleanly to current linus/master.
> Is this acceptable for everyone?
> 
> David, its important to hear your opinion on that because this single
> pull-request would include all VT-d updates you have queued in your
> tree? Is this ok for you?

Yes, that's fine by me. Should I apply patches 1-14 of Weidong's patch
set from Monday first? Or just let you do that?

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/