linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87d4g0c5w5.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:11:06 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Rob Fowler <rjf@...ci.org>
Cc:	eranian@...il.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux

Rob Fowler <rjf@...ci.org> writes:
>
> -- Can it supplant or support oprofile by supporting the tools (Code Analyst, etc) that
>     depend on it?

There's no need to supplant/support oprofile really because at least
short term oprofile will not go away.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/