linux-kernel - Re: [patch 021/104] lib/idr.c: fix rcu related race with idr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081209180250.8d7301a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:02:50 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	"Domenico Andreoli" <cavokz@...il.com>, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"Manfred Spraul" <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	"Clement Calmels" <cboulte@...il.com>,
	"Nadia Derbey" <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>,
	"Pierre Peiffer" <peifferp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 021/104] lib/idr.c: fix rcu related race with idr_find

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:46:13 +1000 "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com> wrote:

> >>
> >> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >>> > 2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> >>> >
> >>> Revert.
> >>>
> >>> This caused problems in the F10 kernel with idr, the drm device alloc
> >>> went all wierd,
> >>> it might be a drm bug but changing this code triggers it and so it
> >>> isn't really "stable"
> >>
> >> Well, maybe it should be reverted in mainlne too, then?
> >
> > It appears idr_replace is broken at least in stable with this patch.
> >
> > I'm trying to track down where the problem is (idr_replace doesn't look like
> > idr_find in a lot of places and I wonder if this has ever been tested.)
> >
> (cc-trimmed).
> 
> Okay I'm not idr expert and maybe what the drm is doing is illegal but
> it never caused a problem up to now.
> 
> The drm grabs an idr minor number using a NULL pointer to reserve the
> number, it then uses idr_replace later
> to stick a pointer into the reserved number. However this seems to be
> what is broken, I'm not sure if this is a legal
> use of idrs but has worked like that for a long time now.
> 
> I can fix the drm to workaround this, and allocate my pointers before
> I try to get a minor number, but I'd like to know
> if my usage is illegal over just overlooked.


<greps for a while>

I assume we're talking about drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c:drm_minor_get_id()?

I don't immediately see anything in the idr code which special-cases a
NULL caller pointer?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/