lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:23:48 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
	"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: fix pre_destory handler

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:19:35 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > +static bool memcg_is_obsolete(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> > +{
> 
> Will this function be called with mem->css.refcnt == 0? If yes, then
> this function is racy.
> 
> cg = mem->css.cgroup
> 				cgroup_diput()
> 				  mem_cgroup_destroy()
> 				    mem->css.cgroup = NULL;
> 				  kfree(cg);
> if (!cg || cgroup_is_removed(cg)...)
> 
> (accessing invalid cg)
> 
Hmm.  then we have to add flag to css itself, anyway.


> > +	struct cgroup *cg = mem->css.cgroup;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * "Being Removed" means pre_destroy() handler is called.
> > +	 * After  "pre_destroy" handler is called, memcg should not
> > +	 * have any additional charges.
> > +	 * This means there are small races for mis-accounting. But this
> > +	 * mis-accounting should happen only under swap-in opration.
> > +	 * (Attachin new task will fail if cgroup is under rmdir()).
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	if (!cg || cgroup_is_removed(cg) || cgroup_is_being_removed(cg))
> > +		return true;
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> ...
> 
> >  static void mem_cgroup_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> >  				struct cgroup *cont)
> >  {
> > -	mem_cgroup_free(mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont));
> > +	struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont):
> > +	mem_cgroup_free(mem);
> > +	/* forget */
> > +	mem->css.cgroup = NULL;
> 
> mem might already be destroyed by mem_cgroup_free(mem).
> 
Ah, maybe. will fix.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ