lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1228868667.6758.176.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:24:27 -0800
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Vinay Sridhar <vinay@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix sys_time to handle intra-tick correction

On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 17:28 +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This fix changes sys_time to use do_gettimeofday instead of get_seconds.
> Running the stime01 test from LTP triggers this error. Calling sys_stime
> and then calling sys_time causes this. "do_settimeofday" subtracts the
> nsec offset from the nsec value(0 in this case) passed to it.
> Subsequently, "set_normalized_timespec" modifies sec and nsec
> accordingly. This compensation is handled in the do_gettimeofday path.
> However, sys_time does not handle this case and reports an incorrect
> seconds value.
> 
> 
> signed-off by : Vinay Sridhar <vinay@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

This does fix the symmetry by using the same interfaces on both sides,
so it seems reasonable to me. However, since do_gettimeofday reads the
clocksource hardware, this may have a slight performance impact to
time() users.

I know privately I said this patch looked fine earlier, so sorry for the
mixed messages, but I really think we should be able to use
get_seconds() without this problem.

Looking more carefully at the code in do_settimeofday(), we should
accumulate the left over cycles, then we set the current time to the
specified time and update the xtime_cache.

So I'm not sure if we're really fixing the right issue here. Further,
running on the x86_64 system, I don't see this issue crop up at all (for
either 64 or 32 bit binaries). I think you mentioned privately that this
was seen on i386, so maybe we need to dig just a bit deeper before going
with this fix.

And sorry again for running hot then cold on this patch. I just didn't
look deeply enough at the issue the first time around. :(

thanks
-john




> --- time.c.orig	2008-12-04 06:30:12.000000000 -0600
> +++ time.c	2008-12-04 06:31:25.000000000 -0600
> @@ -61,7 +61,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_tz);
>   */
>  asmlinkage long sys_time(time_t __user * tloc)
>  {
> -	time_t i = get_seconds();
> +	struct timeval t;	
> +	time_t i;
> +
> +	do_gettimeofday(&t);
> +
> +	i = t.tv_sec;
> 
>  	if (tloc) {
>  		if (put_user(i,tloc))
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ