linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081210224854.GA5167@zarina>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:48:54 +0300
From:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To:	Vorobiev Dmitri <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.fi>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from
	platform_driver remove functions

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:06:34AM +0200, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:03:56PM +0200, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:26:26 +0100 (CET)
> >> > Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >> >>
> >> >> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and
> >> thus
> >> >> of
> >> >> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored
> >> >
> >> > Currently
> >>
> >> Are there really any plans about actually using the return value?
> >
> > It's often used by the drivers, but currently not handled by
> > the subsystem. For example, _remove() callback might return -EBUSY
> > or -EAGAIN, which means that whoever called the _remove() should
> > try later.
> 
> Sure, it's easy to find drivers, which that return a non-dummy value from
> the remove() callback thinking that someone up there will take care of the
> error.
> 
> The point is, however, that
[...]
> SCSI maintainers do not apply the patch

This sometimes happens. You can try to repost your original patch, and
in the commit message briefly describe that return type is unlikely to
change, and give a pointer to this discussion.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/