[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081211073226.GW23742@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:32:28 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug?] bio: add experimental support for inlining a number of bio_vecs inside the bio
On Wed, Dec 10 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:12:38 +0100
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > > experimental??
> >
> > Experimental in the sense that it's the first version, not the concept.
> > It's held up well for me, but just yesterday I received the first bug
> > report on a ppc platform and now you have this on ia64.
>
>
> Well there's another bug report up-list. "next-20081209: pdflush: page
> allocation failure (xfs)".
>
> The clearing of (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO) will call the page allocator in the
> weakest possible mode and will of course spew page allocations warnings
> with great frequency. It should at least add in __GFP_NOWARN.
OK, that must be for the change titled
"bio: only mempool back the largest bio_vec slab cache"
and yes, that does look like it wants a bit more gfp loving, probably
the same as mempool_alloc() would use anyway. I'll get that fixed.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists