lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca992f110812110340k53981469y5710209faeabce4b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:40:08 +0900
From:	"junjie cai" <junjiec@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RT] preempt_disable() in rt_up() not necessary?

Dear List,

I think the preempt_disable() in rt_up() is not necessary.
The highprio trylock-er would still get into infinite loop
if it keep trying without giving the lock holder a chance to release the lock.
I think the user should take care of that.

What do you think?

Thanks.

-- 
/*
 * Junjie Cai (junjiec@...il.com)
 */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ