lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2178680812101724o40df531aw2390e08e2938f4bb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:24:37 +0800
From:	"Zhiwen Zheng" <zhiwen.zh@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IP over Fibre Channel slower than GigaEthernet ?

Could someone point me to resources about doing zero copy in kernel,
such as RDMA over IP, RDMA over FC , please?

2008/12/10 Zhiwen Zheng <zhiwen.zh@...il.com>:
> Hi,
>
> To compare tcp transport speed of IP over FC to that of GigaEthernet,
> I have two machines connected directly with FC or GigaEther, and run
> ttcp to get the result.
>
> configuration of the machines:
> kernel version : 2.6.10
> platform : xscale iop80331 500MHz
> memory : 512MB DDR2
> FC controller : LSI FC949x (using driver mptlan.c)
> GigaEthernet controller : Intel 82546EB
>
>
> In the Ethernet case,  the transport speed is about 90MB/s,
> and cpu usage is about 90%.
>
> In the FC case, the transport speed is about 60MB/s,
> and cpu usage is also about 90%.
>
>  Could someone tell me why FC is slower than GigaEthernet?
> And is it possible to reduce the cpu usage through DMA or something else ?
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ