linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:34:26 -0800
From:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
	"nix.or.die@...glemail.com" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc8

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:46:33PM -0800, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > ok. In this case i'd suggest we should just remove the warning. People do
> > get scared by needless kernel stack dumps - no matter whether it's marked
> > informational or not.
> >
> > So how about the patch below, queued up in tip/x86/debug? Arjan, what do
> > you think?
> 
> How come we don't put it under CONFIG_X86_DEBUG or something and hide
> somewhere in the "Kernel debugging" menu?

On the same lines, can we enable this check with a debug boot option?

thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/