linux-kernel - Re: Btrfs trees for linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081210200604.8e190b0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:06:04 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs trees for linux-next

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:14:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:34:56 -0500 Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just an update, while I still have a long todo list and plenty of things
> > to fix in the code, these src trees have been updated with a disk format
> > I hope to maintain compatibility with from here on.  There are still
> > format changes planned, but should go in through the compat mechanisms
> > in the sources now.
> > 
> > The btrfs trees are still at 2.6.28-rc5, but I just tested against
> > linux-next without problems.
> 
> Do you think this is ready to be added to the end of linux-next, yet?  Or
> is this more -mm material?

I'd prefer that it go into linux-next in the usual fashion.  But the
first step is review..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/