[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1228974272.8766.59.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:44:32 -0800
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"norman@...backs.co.uk" <norman@...backs.co.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Alok Kataria <alokkataria1@...il.com>,
Bruno Prémont <"bruno .premont"@restena.lu>,
"xl@...igned.net" <xl@...igned.net>,
"dsd@...too.org" <dsd@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix VMI crash on boot in 2.6.27+ kernels
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:20 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> it seems still have some problem.
> you moved reserve_top_address before parse_parameter...
I really only care about resetting fixmap_top. Adding more vmalloc
space to accomodate what we stole is just being nice... in practice this
should not be a problem.
> __VMALLOC_RESERVE will be overwriten by vmalloc=...
>
> you may need to split reserve_top_address() to two functions...
For now, misuse vmalloc=XXX at your own risk - why the need for it
anyway?
I agree, it should be cleaned up, as HPA suggests, we should move the
fixmap to a fixed place anyways, and have vmalloc area from the top of
linear memory down to the end of the physical memory mapping. But there
really isn't time to do anything better for 2.6.28.
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists