[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:51:13 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add preadv and pwritev system calls.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:48:36PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hmm. It is the argument ordering used by NetBSD, thats why I used that
> too. It certainly should be the application-visible ordering. We'll
> have glibc between apps and kernel though, so I think we can reorder the
> arguments at syscall level if that helps on these archs. Cc'ing Ulrich
> Drepper for comments on that.
On the other hand, NetBSD have approximately 0% market share.
We shouldn't let them lock us into making a bad decision. Is there
anyone other than NetBSD who has added these syscalls?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists