[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:11:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v3
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra, le Fri 12 Dec 2008 09:25:45 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 13:02 -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > Also, my primary method of using counters is total aggregate count for a
> > > single user-space process.
> >
> > Process, as in single thread, or multi-threaded? I'll assume
> > single-thread.
>
> BTW, just to make sure it is taken into account (I haven't followed the
> thread up to here, just saw a "pid_t" somwhere that alarmed me): for our
> uses, we _do_ need per-kernelthread counters.
Yes, counters are per task - not sure on the exact interface thingy
though - I guess it should be tid_t but glibc does a bit weird there or
something.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists