[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:00:37 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Sorry, I'm still puzzled: I thought the unevictable lru was for
> shared file pages as well as for anon pages? Of course I agree
> with you over the anons (and shm and tmpfs get counted along
> with the anons in this context), but wouldn't we still need
> an unevictable lru for mlocked shared file pages?
Good point, you are correct. I had forgotten about that
part completely - keeping CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU may be
a good idea after all.
--
All Rights Reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists