| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20081212185803.GE11974@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:58:03 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> Cc: smartmontools-support@...ts.sourceforge.net, smartmontools-database-owner@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com> Subject: Re: Intel X25-E running Linux using XFS Hi! > Due to the 100k write cycle lifetime, I will not be performing any more > benchmarks on the SSD itself, such benchmarks are available on > techreport.com but just wanted to send out the smart data for the > smartmontools list and point out it is working with linux+ich7+xfs. > > Overall, whenever I do anything now its just like the entire machine is > sitting in a ramdisk (similar when you boot knoppix and load to ramdisk). > > The techreport benchmarks are here: > http://techreport.com/articles.x/15931 Actually I'd like to know... how does it behave during powerfails while it is being written to? Flashes I seen (USB / SD) developed bad sectors in that case, and ext2/ext3 can't handle that. (And I don't think xfs can handle that either). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists