lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:03:14 -0500
From:	Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: FPGA programming driver architecture

Hi,
I have written some code to program a FPGA in Linux, for two different types of boards: one uses a serial interface (SPI) and the second a parallel interface. I have been able to sucessfully program both boards. I'm now trying to clean my code and make it more generic, as well as better in line with the Linux driver model. I would also like to include it in the mainline kernel if there is interest.

Here is a description of the current architecture (refer to diagrams below): The fpgaload module controls one output GPIOs (PROG), and two input GPIOs (INIT and DONE). These GPIOs are specified in board setup code. Both fpgaload_ser and fpgaload_par modules export a single function to write a byte. The fpgaload driver is a char device to which we can write (/dev/fpgaload) to program a bitstream (FPGA firmware) inside the FPGA. The fpgaload driver will toggle the GPIOs to initiate programming and the then call the corresponding write_byte function based on the interface type specified in board setup code (serial or parallel, or any future interface desired).


FPGA serial bitstream loading architecture

+----------------------+
| FPGA load driver     |
| (fpgaload)           |
+----------------------+
  |             |
  |    +----------------+
  |    | FPGA serial    |
  |    | load driver    |
  |    | (fpgaload_ser) |
  |    +----------------+
  |             |
  |    +-------------------+
  |    | SPI master        |
  |    | controller driver |
  |    +-------------------+
  |             |
  |             |           Linux
------------------------------------
  |             |           HARDWARE
  |             |spi
  |             |
  |      +--------------+
  |      | SPI          |
  +----->| Programming  |
   GPIOs | interface    |
         +--------------+
                    FPGA


FPGA parallel bitstream loading architecture

+----------------------+
| FPGA load driver     |
| (fpgaload)           |
+----------------------+
  |             |
  |    +----------------+
  |    | FPGA parallel  |
  |    | load driver    |
  |    | (fpgaload_par) |
  |    +----------------+
  |             |
  |             |           Linux
------------------------------------
  |             |           HARDWARE
  |             |parallel
  |             |
  |      +--------------+
  |      | Parallel     |
  +----->| Programming  |
   GPIOs | interface    |
         +--------------+
                    FPGA


The problem with that approach is that when loading the fpgaload module with modprobe, it will automatically try to load the fpgaload_ser and fpgaload_par modules, even if only serial interface was specified in board setup code for example. This is not good when building a kernel for similar but different boards.

Probably a better approach would be for the fpgaload_Ser and fpgaload_par modules to register themselves with the fpgaload module. Then, should the fpgaload module be built using a BUS driver structure? Or anyone having any suggestions on how it should be implemented?

Hugo Villeneuve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ