[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49444A44.3030206@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:50:28 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] rt/workqueue: fix an early crash and some warnings
Impact: fix early crash and build warnings
While building the broken/rt/workqueue topic, I got various warnings:
kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘delayed_work_timer_fn’:
kernel/workqueue.c:214: attention : passing argument 3 of ‘__queue_work’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
This one is the cause of an early crash: the adress of the priority is passed instead of its
value, hence the following BUG_ON() triggering on sched.c:rt_mutex_setprio()
BUG_ON(prio < 0 || prio > MAX_PRIO)
Various warnings are displayed because of confusion between common linked-list and priority
sorted linked-list:
kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘flush_work’:
kernel/workqueue.c:527: attention : passing argument 1 of ‘list_empty’ from incompatible pointer type
kernel/workqueue.c:535: attention : assignment from incompatible pointer type
kernel/workqueue.c:539: attention : assignment from incompatible pointer type
This patch fixes them (hopefully correctly).
broken/rt/workqueue boots correctly now.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f0c32ff..b704c40 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void delayed_work_timer_fn(unsigned long __data)
struct workqueue_struct *wq = cwq->wq;
__queue_work(wq_per_cpu(wq, smp_processor_id()),
- &dwork->work, &dwork->prio);
+ &dwork->work, dwork->prio);
}
/**
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_workqueue);
int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
- struct list_head *prev;
+ struct plist_head *prev;
struct wq_barrier barr;
might_sleep();
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
prev = NULL;
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
- if (!list_empty(&work->entry)) {
+ if (!plist_node_empty(&work->entry)) {
/*
* See the comment near try_to_grab_pending()->smp_rmb().
* If it was re-queued under us we are not going to wait.
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
smp_rmb();
if (unlikely(cwq != get_wq_data(work)))
goto out;
- prev = &work->entry;
+ prev = &work->entry.plist;
} else {
if (cwq->current_work != work)
goto out;
--
1.6.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists