[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812122035410.15781@quilx.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:36:21 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
bcrl@...ck.org, list-linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] mm: kfree_size
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Allocators which don't care so much could just define kfree_size to kfree.
>
> Thoughts? Any other good candidate callers?
Would be a good idea together with some sort of allocator skeleton. Not
having to carry the size is especially important for alternate kmalloc
array implementations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists