[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54939.1229149205@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:20:05 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: nab@...nel.org
Cc: linux-iscsi-target-dev@...glegroups.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Announce]: Target_Core_Mod/ConfigFS and LIO-Target v3.0 work
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:40:09 PST, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" said:
> Too bad, because you are missing out on the most advanced ConfigFS
> enabled storage engine on the planet.
OK. I *have* to ask.. ;)
What's the *second* most advanced configfs-enabled storage engine?
The only in-tree users of configfs I could find (grepping for the string
'config_item_init') were drivers/net/netconsole, fs/ocfs2, and fs/dlm, so
"most advanced configfs" is well into "world's tallest midget" territory...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists