[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081214185239.GA2039@colo.lackof.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:52:39 -0700
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
To: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MSI messages
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:15:15PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
...
> > A "GSI" (Generic Sys Interrupt?) is associated with each entry in
> > the MSI-X table. Driver then calls request_irq() to bind an interrupt
> > handler to each GSI. So the driver never directly sees the "message".
>
> Oh, you mean the array of irq_handlers in the MSI-X table should
> correspond to a particular message ?
No. I mean each MSI-X entry has an address+message pair and each MSI-X entry
is associated with the parameters passed to each call of request_irq().
Pass in unique private data to each call of request_irq() and the driver
can determine which message was delivered when the ISR gets called.
(ISR == Interrupt Service Routine, aka driver IRQ handler)
> I remember sometime back somebody stated that one might not get
> the requested number of handlers what you requested.
Correct. The limit is defined by the number of GSI's available
from the HW.
> In such a case, if the irq_handlers are mapped in a static fashion, one
> might not get any interrupt callbacks for a specific functionality of
> the hardware. Or is there something missing in what i understood ?
Correct.
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists