[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081214232128.5c886379@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:21:28 +0100
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc: balajirrao@...nmoko.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Green <andy@...nmoko.com>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 4/7] rtc: PCF50633 rtc driver
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:34:30 +0530
Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...nmoko.org> wrote:
> Hmm. This patch is included in [PATCH 1/7] of the series - which
> implements the core driver. This core driver needs this file to compile
> and not including there is going to break the bisectability of the
> series. Isn't this what I'm supposed to do ? Please correct me if I'm
> wrong.
ok, then don't break.
> > > + pcf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > uh? where did you set up the pointer?
> >
> >
> > > + /* Set up IRQ handlers */
> > > + pcf->irq_handler[PCF50633_IRQ_ALARM].handler = pcf50633_rtc_irq;
> > > + pcf->irq_handler[PCF50633_IRQ_SECOND].handler = pcf50633_rtc_irq;
> > > +
> > > + pcf->rtc.rtc_dev = rtc;
> >
> > ??
> >
>
> It's done in the core driver - [PATCH 1/7] of this series.
mm. that's strange. a platform driver is supposed to receive informational
structures (regions, irqs, ...) and init driver data by itself. you shouldn't need
to mess with the drvdata pointer.
I do not also feel fine with the irq handlers setup. Your core should export
a function for irq registration.
> Thank you for the review. Will send again after resolving the issues.
thanks for your contribution. you are doing great things at openmoko.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists