[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081215154800.GA20504@ioremap.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:48:00 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v4 13/14] inotify: reimplement inotify using fsnotify
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:44:01AM -0500, Eric Paris (eparis@...hat.com) wrote:
> > While you are at it, please update inode_setattr() so that it dropped
> > inotify watches if new permissions do not allow to read data.
>
> Now this isn't so easy.... Do you have suggestions how to do this with
> inotify as it stands today? the vfs needs to know what's hanging on the
> open fd in userspace... Not a bad idea. I'll look, but clearly not a
> core patch....
I could put inotify check into notify_change(), which will check if new
permissions do not allow reading for the users stored in
inode->inotify_watches, each one would be dereferenced to inotify
device, which holds a user context, which added watch object, so it can
be checked the same way generic_permission() works.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists