[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c86c4470812151258m11b7185sbd629a82c91778bb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:58:10 +0100
From: "stephane eranian" <eranian@...glemail.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Vince Weaver" <vince@...ter.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
"Robert Richter" <robert.richter@....com>,
"Arjan van de Veen" <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v3
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> We've implemented the essence of these variants, with sharing the resource
> being the sane default, and with the sysadmin also having a configuration
> vector to reserve the resource to himself permanently. (There could be
> more variations of this.)
>
Reading the v4 code, it does not appear the sysadmin can specify which
resource to reserve. The current code reserves a number of counters.
This is problematic with hardware where not all counters can measure
everything, or when not all PMU registers are counters.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists